|
Home |
View Poll Results: great no-AI PBEM - poll #2 - starting settlers | |||
One | 6 | 75.00% | |
Two | 0 | 0% | |
Three | 2 | 25.00% | |
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-07-2004, 22:56 | #11 |
Emperor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,946
|
Apologies to Beam, it was indeed not that clear, though the 1st question only speaks about settlers. I added the "(or discuss)" mention when I wasn't sure of what to do. But it looks like more people want only 1 settler (and so 1 worker, that's for sure !). If anyone apart fom Beam prefers to start with 2 or 3 settlers, raise your voice ! That's why I wanted people to express their vote in posts and say why they voted this or that.
__________________
Sent from my Debian |
11-07-2004, 11:09 | #12 |
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France.
Posts: 445
|
if i had 3 settlers and one starting point that do not please me, i had the 1 or 2 remaining join my capital to increase production ...
__________________
WW 2 in the pacific - Spoiler Micro-site on http://arghis.free.fr/cdz-witp/ |
12-07-2004, 12:07 | #13 |
Emperor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,946
|
Well, this one is clear : we'll start with one settler ; the game will last longer, but we'll also have more control on our starting position. This also means we'll get one worker, like in the Epic game. And of course no one will get a 3rd unit, even Kemal with his Chasqui scout (not the 1st time I say it, but if no one says anything, then I assume you all agree ?).
We're all seafearing, except for Eldakkar. But we're all meant to start by the sea.
__________________
Sent from my Debian |