15-10-2006, 21:35 | #21 |
Customized Admin :)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sailing the seas of cheese.
Posts: 5,852
|
What puzzles me is that members of parliament are now asking question at the minister about this. Don't they have serious problems to solve.....
__________________
I fed my Dog the American Dream Well, he rolled over and he started to scream He said, I dig the taste of salt but it don't keep me alive yeah, yeah |
15-10-2006, 23:50 | #22 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 4,828
|
It puzzles me even more, because I know certain CDA MP's complain that other MP's, especially GroenLinks, ask for an emergency debate for every fart a minister breaks. Now they're doing it themselves. This is what they call "incidentalism".
But it's understandable. CDA probably has a lot of Lingo-watching voters. (Not me! [])
__________________
|
16-10-2006, 09:30 | #23 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,493
|
Your MP to debate, I'd rather see them debating over something a minister does than over something that was in Hart van Nederland.
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |
16-10-2006, 13:29 | #24 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 4,828
|
They do, but only when they do something bad.
__________________
|
16-10-2006, 19:07 | #25 | |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,196
|
Quote:
The solution can be quite simply: transform the NOS / Nederland3 in an independent foundation. This foundation may benefit from subsidies (preferably not), but never ever should there be a minister or MP that has anything to say about it. I'm quite sure this foundation can be financially well-balanced, without having the need to make a profit. In one line: I think it is absurd we have a secretary for media affairs.
__________________
Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket |
|