|
29-10-2004, 18:00
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,270
|
2vs2vs2vs2 open thread
my fellow despots;
I have two things to clear out, and sooner rather then later! first, Killer will be away for some time, I reccon we wait or is there a replacement player? second, more important! We agreed before teh game we would NOT play with fixed alliances on, because it would mean we would know eachother from turn 1. Instead we agreed to make no trades/alliances/techdeals or any of such at all between different players, in other words each players' 2 civs would always be at a state of war with all other civs on tha map. Right? This is mundo importanto. Please discuss it asap, as meeeting some other guy may not take that long. 
__________________
Go ahead punk. Make my day. |
|
|
|
29-10-2004, 19:56
|
#2 |
|
Nebuchadnezzar II
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
|
Re Killer: sad, but what we can do?
OK but then who declares on who? War happiness is a big deal at the current setup. We can just stay at peace and make sure there is no communicatons between ppls going on until there is a possiblity of a "non-phony" wars.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare Ciceron (Marcus Tullius) |
|
|
|
|
29-10-2004, 20:13
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,270
|
I think we should do it the honorable way. If player A lands 10 units next to player B's capitol, player A should declare war in that turn, it is not fair that Player B has to declare in this case, and gets the hapiness.
__________________
Go ahead punk. Make my day. |
|
|
|
|
29-10-2004, 22:08
|
#4 |
|
c00l b33r
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beat 'm up Scotty!. Lives in the Lands that are Nether.
Posts: 5,094
|
Human players can't declare other than moving a unit to another one iirc.
__________________
That was a pretty good gamble. -- Scotty, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2821.5, Episode 14
|
|
|
|
|
29-10-2004, 22:50
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,108
|
You could also try to remove the active peace deal by renegotiating peace in the diplo screen, though that wouldn't work when the peace has been signed less than 20 turns ago, I suppose.
__________________
<b>\"In the Game of Thrones, you win or you die\" </b> |
|
|
|
|
23-11-2004, 11:50
|
#6 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
kemal: it works if not with a (##) behind it.
me back, who has the save? I did not find one waiting for me
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
|
|
|
|
24-11-2004, 15:18
|
#7 | |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,196
|
Quote:
Of course we can make trades/alliances/techdeals between different players. This idea of allways war drops completely out of the blue for me.
__________________
Vrooooooooooommmmmm   Stapel doesn't like cricket |
|
|
|
|
|
24-11-2004, 15:20
|
#8 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
the only thing I find in the other thread was 'no alliances' in the sense of 'no MAs' - but that didn#t get agreed on either, ever!
thanx stapel.
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
|
|
|
|
24-11-2004, 15:32
|
#9 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,196
|
The only thing debatable is indeed MAs between players.
__________________
Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket |
|
|
|
|
24-11-2004, 16:16
|
#10 |
|
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 3,196
|
From the other thread:
Linked alliences of course, and no alliences permitted between others. Linked alliences is not on, due to good reasons. Furthermore, only MAs are not allowed (up to deabte, I am fine with all). trading techs, lux and money is all fine!
__________________
Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
