1 vs 1vs 1 vs 1 4 player PBEM - GAME STARTED

Stapel · 17-12-2003, 13:52

Hi all,

I would like to try that. No AIs involved!

Anyone?

anarres · 17-12-2003, 14:15

The team game of PP & Kemal vs Sky and me is great - have you considered that approach?

Aggie · 17-12-2003, 14:21

i'd like to be in a 2vs2 like anarres suggests. I am already in a 1vs1vs1vs1vs1vs1 and one is more than enough...

col · 17-12-2003, 14:38

We once started a 4x2 game which had a lot of potential where each player has 2 civs (playing consecutively to speed things up) Normal rules apply. Essntially playing with yourself (ooh er)as ally.

I'd fancy a game like that. You can choose complementary civs....

Aggie · 17-12-2003, 14:39

Col's idea also sounds like fun...

Stapel · 17-12-2003, 15:07

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by col

We once started a 4x2 game which had a lot of potential where each player has 2 civs (playing consecutively to speed things up) Normal rules apply. Essntially playing with yourself (ooh er)as ally.

I'd fancy a game like that. You can choose complementary civs....

So: 4 humans, each controlling 2 civs? each civ couple perma MPP-ed?And no pre-fixed allies between the humans?

Seems fair to me. Any rules on leader fishing? Is perma peace an option?

I really like the option. I am looking forward to a no AI game.

Stapel · 17-12-2003, 15:09

So, if Col, Aggie and me are in, we only need one more!

col · 17-12-2003, 15:28

Perma peace between your 2 civs so no cheap leader fishing. Just agree never to declare war on your other civ. Its pretty easy to spot!! Trading as normal when you meet yourself - essentially you'll give techs to your other civ so you need to research along different paths. You can also gift money / cities to your other civ.

Anything goes on MA/MPP between players since no AIs.

Adds a whole new dimension I think.

Monarch? No AIs so its just a question of how many happy people. I think lower levels tend to balance out lack of lux more.

Aggie · 17-12-2003, 15:46

Sounds all very well

I agree with Monarch

Stapel · 17-12-2003, 17:32

Really looking forward....
Monrach is fine!

If no one else wants to join 2 vs 2 vs 2 is ok too, for me.

17-12-2003, 13:52	#1
Stapel Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Netherlands. Posts: 3,196	1 vs 1vs 1 vs 1 4 player PBEM - GAME STARTED Hi all, I would like to try that. No AIs involved! Anyone? __________________ Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket

17-12-2003, 14:15	#2
anarres anarchist butcher Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: United States of Whatever. Posts: 4,677	The team game of PP & Kemal vs Sky and me is great - have you considered that approach? __________________ <b>Calculate the probability of culture flips: Flip Calc</b>

17-12-2003, 14:38	#4
col King Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: South Sandwich Islands. Posts: 1,529	We once started a 4x2 game which had a lot of potential where each player has 2 civs (playing consecutively to speed things up) Normal rules apply. Essntially playing with yourself (ooh er)as ally. I'd fancy a game like that. You can choose complementary civs.... __________________ I can't be arsed.

17-12-2003, 15:09	#7
Stapel Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Netherlands. Posts: 3,196	So, if Col, Aggie and me are in, we only need one more! __________________ Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket

17-12-2003, 15:28	#8
col King Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: South Sandwich Islands. Posts: 1,529	Perma peace between your 2 civs so no cheap leader fishing. Just agree never to declare war on your other civ. Its pretty easy to spot!! Trading as normal when you meet yourself - essentially you'll give techs to your other civ so you need to research along different paths. You can also gift money / cities to your other civ. Anything goes on MA/MPP between players since no AIs. Adds a whole new dimension I think. Monarch? No AIs so its just a question of how many happy people. I think lower levels tend to balance out lack of lux more. __________________ I can't be arsed.

17-12-2003, 14:21	#3
Aggie Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: N/A Posts: 4,490	i'd like to be in a 2vs2 like anarres suggests. I am already in a 1vs1vs1vs1vs1vs1 and one is more than enough...

17-12-2003, 14:39	#5
Aggie Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: N/A Posts: 4,490	Col's idea also sounds like fun...

17-12-2003, 15:46	#9
Aggie Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: N/A Posts: 4,490	Sounds all very well I agree with Monarch

17-12-2003, 17:32	#10
Stapel Emperor Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Netherlands. Posts: 3,196	Really looking forward.... Monrach is fine! If no one else wants to join 2 vs 2 vs 2 is ok too, for me. __________________ Vrooooooooooommmmmm Stapel doesn't like cricket