[SPOILER] 4 Vs 4 Locked Alliance - A Pression Game - Page 2

barbu1977 · 24-04-2006, 21:57

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by killercane
America Ind Exp
Aztecs Mil Rel
England Com Sea
Sumeria Agr Sci

This looks nice.

Quote:

quote:
Maya (or France + Celts, Iro+Egypt, ugh)
India
_____
Portugal
Germany

Could you elaborate on this a little?

barbu1977 · 24-04-2006, 22:27

I give you:
The Hittites, the Aztecs, Cartage and the Babs...

To do this, I graded colours from the list above to the UU ranking, and noticed that in the com. civs, the hittites were the nicest one to keep.

From there, I did the same thing with the Agri civs, trying once with the Sumerians and once with the aztecs. Sumerians left either the chinese, the viking or japan. The aztecs gave left nothing realy threatning.

The only concern we may have is that all these civs will have an early GA if there is early fighting.

killercane · 25-04-2006, 00:37

Those above (the ugh comment) were the other civs that filled out the remaining civ traits if we went with Portgal and Germany, if that makes any sense.

I like Barbu's suggestions. They are all early UUs, and with sea lanes probably wont be useful. The 3 man chariot is the only good upgradeable fast unit, and at 30 shields its still going to cost them the same as regular horses.

Edit: I just noticed where WHomp requested an "early warfare" sea map. I think we can still go with Barbu's list but I can be convinced otherwise.

Wosret · 25-04-2006, 02:58

so we may have 3 options in the end:
1)Barbus:
-hitites
-aztecs
-cartage
-babs
2)My 1st:
-mongol
-french
-spain
-sumeria
3)My 2nd:
-mongol
-korea/grecee
-spain
-maya

I vote 3, with korea instead grecia.

Wow, and should be our team name!?

killercane · 25-04-2006, 03:48

I'll go with whatever the team decides. I'm interested to know what they picked for us. How do we want to divide up who will take which civ?

classical_hero · 25-04-2006, 05:08

Do not forget that it is Mongol/Zululand. I would prefer to have Zululand than the Mongols.

Here is my attempt at an excel picture of my rating of UUs.

According to the colours here are the civs we most want to give to them. Included are civs that are poor but have another paring and thus have a different colour
America Ind Exp
Inca Agr Exp
Hittites Com Exp
Aztecs Mil Agr*
Egypt Rel Ind*
Germany Sci Mil
Babylon Sci Rel
Portugal Exp Sea *
Zuluand Exp Mil
Korea Sci Com *

It is amazing but Expanisitic civ have shitty UUs. Since we need a useless sea civ then Portugal are our choice there. We can have Egypt, Aztecs and Korea.

So basically here is my choice for the four civs after some elimitation. I think this is a pretty poor choice of a group of civs, which is what we want.

Portugal
Korea
Egypt
Aztecs

barbu1977 · 25-04-2006, 06:01

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by Classical_Hero
Portugal
Korea
Egypt
Aztecs

I like this better than mine.

I guess putting the Korean as OK makes this nice. It's still a powerfull UU than can do it's share of damage.

But I realy like the fact that their GA will not be grouped.

classical_hero · 25-04-2006, 06:09

The thing is that w can counter that UU because they will need to have enough defenders to stop us form make it ineffective. The H'wacha hass only been beefed up just like the F15 because those units could not trigger a GA before. With the H'wacha it can actually be pretty useless.

Wosret · 25-04-2006, 16:12

Portugal
Korea
Egypt
Aztecs

Agreed

killercane · 25-04-2006, 20:20

We have America, England, Aztecs, Babylon.

How do we want to divide it up? I am fine with any of them, but would prefer Aztecs or Babs I think. I would like to drop off some hostiles in their territory early on.

24-04-2006, 22:27	#12
barbu1977 Emperor Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Blame Canada!. Posts: 3,501	I give you: The Hittites, the Aztecs, Cartage and the Babs... To do this, I graded colours from the list above to the UU ranking, and noticed that in the com. civs, the hittites were the nicest one to keep. From there, I did the same thing with the Agri civs, trying once with the Sumerians and once with the aztecs. Sumerians left either the chinese, the viking or japan. The aztecs gave left nothing realy threatning. The only concern we may have is that all these civs will have an early GA if there is early fighting. __________________ Postcount = Postcount + 1; //Postcount++

25-04-2006, 00:37	#13
killercane Prince Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 959	Those above (the ugh comment) were the other civs that filled out the remaining civ traits if we went with Portgal and Germany, if that makes any sense. I like Barbu's suggestions. They are all early UUs, and with sea lanes probably wont be useful. The 3 man chariot is the only good upgradeable fast unit, and at 30 shields its still going to cost them the same as regular horses. Edit: I just noticed where WHomp requested an "early warfare" sea map. I think we can still go with Barbu's list but I can be convinced otherwise.

25-04-2006, 02:58	#14
Wosret Chieftain Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Brazil. Posts: 194	so we may have 3 options in the end: 1)Barbus: -hitites -aztecs -cartage -babs 2)My 1st: -mongol -french -spain -sumeria 3)My 2nd: -mongol -korea/grecee -spain -maya I vote 3, with korea instead grecia. Wow, and should be our team name!?

25-04-2006, 03:48	#15
killercane Prince Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 959	I'll go with whatever the team decides. I'm interested to know what they picked for us. How do we want to divide up who will take which civ?

25-04-2006, 05:08	#16
classical_hero Warlord Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Perth, Australia. Posts: 443	Do not forget that it is Mongol/Zululand. I would prefer to have Zululand than the Mongols. Here is my attempt at an excel picture of my rating of UUs. According to the colours here are the civs we most want to give to them. Included are civs that are poor but have another paring and thus have a different colour America Ind Exp Inca Agr Exp Hittites Com Exp Aztecs Mil Agr* Egypt Rel Ind* Germany Sci Mil Babylon Sci Rel Portugal Exp Sea * Zuluand Exp Mil Korea Sci Com * It is amazing but Expanisitic civ have shitty UUs. Since we need a useless sea civ then Portugal are our choice there. We can have Egypt, Aztecs and Korea. So basically here is my choice for the four civs after some elimitation. I think this is a pretty poor choice of a group of civs, which is what we want. Portugal Korea Egypt Aztecs

25-04-2006, 06:09	#18
classical_hero Warlord Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Perth, Australia. Posts: 443	The thing is that w can counter that UU because they will need to have enough defenders to stop us form make it ineffective. The H'wacha hass only been beefed up just like the F15 because those units could not trigger a GA before. With the H'wacha it can actually be pretty useless.

25-04-2006, 16:12	#19
Wosret Chieftain Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Brazil. Posts: 194	Portugal Korea Egypt Aztecs Agreed

25-04-2006, 20:20	#20
killercane Prince Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 959	We have America, England, Aztecs, Babylon. How do we want to divide it up? I am fine with any of them, but would prefer Aztecs or Babs I think. I would like to drop off some hostiles in their territory early on.