20-11-2009, 04:39 | #201 | |
Emperor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blame Canada!.
Posts: 3,501
|
Quote:
I also said that I think the remaining of the map is, I think, balanced. Personally I still think excluding that excluding lux trade is the best way for all of you to go. But I'm only the mapmaker, not the referee.
__________________
Postcount = Postcount + 1; //Postcount++ |
|
20-11-2009, 06:05 | #202 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bremer in München
Posts: 55
|
Thats what I meant. Since it is just a very tiny change in rules and you recommend it I am a bit surprised nobody wants to go that route. But anyhow, lets see how it works out. Maybe my judgement on the advantage lux will give is wrong.
|
20-11-2009, 07:00 | #203 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 48
|
I don't really see how banning lux trades would help anything, to be honest.
|
20-11-2009, 08:58 | #204 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Netherlands.
Posts: 4,169
|
Quote:
However, is it really a problem? Must the map be completely balanced? Because if you feel this should be, then you made a mistake before you started this game. Then you should've started this debate before the start of the game and you should've told the mapmaker to balance everything.
__________________
"Death is lighter than a feather, but duty is heavier than a mountain..." - The Eye of the World |
|
20-11-2009, 13:18 | #205 | |
Chieftain
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
|
|
20-11-2009, 16:05 | #206 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,493
|
Banning (excess) luxury trade is something with a minor effect on the game, but it does help making the situation worse than it is. It doesn't really hurt the game either, so I'm for it.
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |
20-11-2009, 16:41 | #207 |
Chieftain
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 34
|
With the ammount of turns you have been missing no luxury resources trade will help you
|
20-11-2009, 17:09 | #208 |
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USS Defiant
Posts: 3,827
|
I'm with barbu (as AFAICS he is the only one who is able to make a statement on knowing enough facts): Ban luxury trades. But I don't mind if it stays allowed either.
__________________
Being without a signature since November 2004. |
20-11-2009, 20:00 | #209 |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
ever heard of queuing orders, builds and research?
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
20-11-2009, 20:33 | #210 |
c00l b33r
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beat 'm up Scotty!. Lives in the Lands that are Nether.
Posts: 5,094
|
Yup, got everything queued for Domination
__________________
That was a pretty good gamble. -- Scotty, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2821.5, Episode 14
|