Meli's Challenge (or another shameless rip-off) - Page 37

BCLG100 · 14-07-2006, 01:22

think akots got it in one really.

Socrates · 14-07-2006, 01:30

My theory (developped 3 years ago when I started to post in forums) is that a normal thread has 1 post for 10 views. A spam thread would have many more posts and less views, like this one, and even more like the 'Word Association' thread (which I very rarely visit because I'm not interested).

Whomp · 14-07-2006, 01:38

I like the spam here. I've always been interested in what all of you have to say. It's interesting and many of you make me laugh.
Here look at this. I think it's funny.

This is headcrusher vs. facepincher.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=4InuqZ9Ul...n%20the%20hall

Pastorius · 14-07-2006, 01:40

I think the fact that we discuss spam quality alone makes this thread pwn the WA thread. Besides, this thread holds more original content.

And it was created back when Mel was envious of my size

Pastorius · 14-07-2006, 01:40

Postcount envy

BCLG100 · 14-07-2006, 01:51

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by Paalikles

I think the fact that we discuss spam quality alone makes this thread pwn the WA thread. Besides, this thread holds more original content.

And it was created back when Mel was envious of my size

yet it took my post about the WA thread to revive this one

akots · 14-07-2006, 01:58

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by kryszcztov
... a normal thread has 1 post for 10 views. A spam thread would have many more posts and less views, like this one ...

Yes, but this one has almost 10 views for every post.

Socrates · 14-07-2006, 02:32

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by akots

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by kryszcztov
... a normal thread has 1 post for 10 views. A spam thread would have many more posts and less views, like this one ...

Yes, but this one has almost 10 views for every post.

No, a bit less than that. Plus, this is an old spam thread. You'll see in a few days, if we continue like that...

Pastorius · 14-07-2006, 09:31

Old school spam baby. Old school

Pastorius · 14-07-2006, 09:31

14-07-2006, 01:22	#361
BCLG100 Deity Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Lahndan Posts: 6,220	think akots got it in one really. __________________ the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!!

14-07-2006, 01:30	#362
Socrates Emperor Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 3,946	My theory (developped 3 years ago when I started to post in forums) is that a normal thread has 1 post for 10 views. A spam thread would have many more posts and less views, like this one, and even more like the 'Word Association' thread (which I very rarely visit because I'm not interested). __________________ Sent from my Debian

14-07-2006, 01:38	#363
Whomp King Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Chicago. Posts: 2,388	I like the spam here. I've always been interested in what all of you have to say. It's interesting and many of you make me laugh. Here look at this. I think it's funny. This is headcrusher vs. facepincher. http://youtube.com/watch?v=4InuqZ9Ul...n%20the%20hall __________________ If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it.--W. C. Fields

14-07-2006, 01:40	#364
Pastorius Custard used tile Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Opening a can Posts: 3,158	I think the fact that we discuss spam quality alone makes this thread pwn the WA thread. Besides, this thread holds more original content. And it was created back when Mel was envious of my size __________________

14-07-2006, 01:40	#365
Pastorius Custard used tile Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Opening a can Posts: 3,158	Postcount envy __________________

14-07-2006, 09:31	#369
Pastorius Custard used tile Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Opening a can Posts: 3,158	Old school spam baby. Old school __________________

14-07-2006, 09:31	#370
Pastorius Custard used tile Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Opening a can Posts: 3,158	__________________