Rule The World II - Page 12

Dandridge · 06-12-2007, 09:31

Though technically probobaly not a forbidden double move I think it's a bit against a good game etiqette what akots just did (2400 BC). Previous turn his Warrior was 2 tiles away from my Settler. He logged in last during the turn and made a DM trying to kill my Settler. Dirty

akots · 06-12-2007, 17:26

Well, I find your accusations ridiculous, mister Danridge. I do suggest that you keep yourself civilized here. The point actually is that my warrior have not even seen your settler - warrior pair before moving.

Dandridge · 06-12-2007, 18:30

I didn't accuse anything. I just told a fact. Whether you saw my settler previous turn or not is irrelevant. It was still an active use of DM in the start of a war. But as I said it was just dirty, not forbidden, action I think.

Matrix · 06-12-2007, 19:06

It's certainly not done. But I consider any double move with effect not done.

akots · 06-12-2007, 19:37

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by Dandridge
... But as I said it was just dirty, not forbidden, action I think.

Sure, you can think whatever you want.

I do find your way of thinking quite strange and especially I find the way of how you are expressing your thinking quite inappropriate.

NHJ · 06-12-2007, 20:42

All the &@^^*%^@) jungle in South America is getting to me. At least in modern times we can just cut it down with ease...

Matrix · 07-12-2007, 01:56

Last time I checked iron working was a classic tech.

Robboo · 07-12-2007, 02:16

dan...post#1...unless he killed your settler adn declared war... you have no leg to stand on.

The doublemove rule in this game:

Doublemoves are allowed in all cases except when accompanied by a declaration of war. In that case the declaring player is not allowed any offensive action against declared player until either:
a) 18 hours after end of the turn where war is declared.
b) the declared player logs in after end of the turn where war is declared.
The declaration of war itself still allows units of the declaring player offensive actions against the declared player in the turn where war is declared.

BCLG100 · 07-12-2007, 02:37

Infact he has quite the leg to stand on. He was DM'd imagine if it had been his capital and there had been a warrior 2 turns away but before the borders has expanded more than once, if you get to a particular place you can attack the capital in two turns but because the player used to moves in succession the first to move into position which the defender can see the second to move outside the capital.

I can point you to that cfc isdg thread for further details

whilst the details are not exactly similar the principle is.

akots · 07-12-2007, 03:23

Please do continue this interesting argument about the legs or feet or moccasins especially considering the fact that neither of you have actually a slightest idea of what happened.

06-12-2007, 17:26	#112
akots Nebuchadnezzar II Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Glover Park Posts: 4,459	Well, I find your accusations ridiculous, mister Danridge. I do suggest that you keep yourself civilized here. The point actually is that my warrior have not even seen your settler - warrior pair before moving. __________________ Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)

06-12-2007, 19:06	#114
Matrix Administrator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Tampere, Finland Posts: 4,828	It's certainly not done. But I consider any double move with effect not done. __________________

06-12-2007, 20:42	#116
NHJ Chieftain Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: . Posts: 214	All the &@^^*%^@) jungle in South America is getting to me. At least in modern times we can just cut it down with ease... __________________ Supreme Ruler of Nicodemia \| Cave Canem

07-12-2007, 01:56	#117
Matrix Administrator Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Tampere, Finland Posts: 4,828	Last time I checked iron working was a classic tech. __________________

07-12-2007, 02:37	#119
BCLG100 Deity Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Lahndan Posts: 6,220	Infact he has quite the leg to stand on. He was DM'd imagine if it had been his capital and there had been a warrior 2 turns away but before the borders has expanded more than once, if you get to a particular place you can attack the capital in two turns but because the player used to moves in succession the first to move into position which the defender can see the second to move outside the capital. I can point you to that cfc isdg thread for further details whilst the details are not exactly similar the principle is. __________________ the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!!

06-12-2007, 09:31	#111
Dandridge Chieftain Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: . Posts: 19	Though technically probobaly not a forbidden double move I think it's a bit against a good game etiqette what akots just did (2400 BC). Previous turn his Warrior was 2 tiles away from my Settler. He logged in last during the turn and made a DM trying to kill my Settler. Dirty

06-12-2007, 18:30	#113
Dandridge Chieftain Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: . Posts: 19	I didn't accuse anything. I just told a fact. Whether you saw my settler previous turn or not is irrelevant. It was still an active use of DM in the start of a war. But as I said it was just dirty, not forbidden, action I think.

07-12-2007, 02:16	#118
Robboo King Join Date: May 2006 Location: Cajun Country. Posts: 2,002	dan...post#1...unless he killed your settler adn declared war... you have no leg to stand on. The doublemove rule in this game: Doublemoves are allowed in all cases except when accompanied by a declaration of war. In that case the declaring player is not allowed any offensive action against declared player until either: a) 18 hours after end of the turn where war is declared. b) the declared player logs in after end of the turn where war is declared. The declaration of war itself still allows units of the declaring player offensive actions against the declared player in the turn where war is declared.

07-12-2007, 03:23	#120
akots Nebuchadnezzar II Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Glover Park Posts: 4,459	Please do continue this interesting argument about the legs or feet or moccasins especially considering the fact that neither of you have actually a slightest idea of what happened. __________________ Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare Ciceron (Marcus Tullius)