Hattrick Quick Question and Answer Thread - Page 57

Dell19 · 21-06-2006, 19:37

62.5%, 25%, 10%, 2.5%

Or something like that.

Tubby Rower · 21-06-2006, 19:52

I've heard that some people devote a full 3% to the VIP boxes

arne1 · 21-06-2006, 20:27

As far as I know Dell gives the normal distribution.

Dell19 · 22-06-2006, 04:21

Some people vary it by 0.5 in VIPs and the second one however that doesn't make a massive difference.

tofra · 23-06-2006, 21:39

What's better: 5-4-1 or 5-3-2? Ít for next season, when i'm going to train defenders.
At that point I have the availability of 2 Formidable scorers, and 1x Excelent Mid, 1x Solid Mid, 1x Passable Mid, 1x Passable Winger.
Basicly, should I give up attacking for Midfielders (meaning more posession?)

Darth Pugwash · 23-06-2006, 22:31

I think you would lose out on quite a bit of posession playing a three-man midfield with those players, unless you are in a very weak division, so I would go for 5-4-1 seeing as your strikers sound good.

(better than mine anyways!)

arne1 · 24-06-2006, 00:15

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by tofra

What's better: 5-4-1 or 5-3-2? Ít for next season, when i'm going to train defenders.
At that point I have the availability of 2 Formidable scorers, and 1x Excelent Mid, 1x Solid Mid, 1x Passable Mid, 1x Passable Winger.
Basicly, should I give up attacking for Midfielders (meaning more posession?)

You should make sure that you have both options available, so you can tailor your team to the opponent.

BCLG100 · 24-06-2006, 03:37

is that having either formation at say solid level?

arne1 · 24-06-2006, 09:59

Quote:

quote:Originally posted by BCLG100

is that having either formation at say solid level?

Solid suffices, i ma not sure passable is enoughr to avoid confusion.

socralynnek · 24-06-2006, 10:23

Even at solid, there can be some small confusion, but I agree it's so seldom that from passable on, it is worth the risk.
tofra, I'd more go for 5-3-2 as you have two nice strikers. 5-4-1 would be a waste then.
Either play CA with one or two wingers or (as you don't have any real strong wingers) you could play with 3 IM or 2IM +1WTM and play AIM.

But for both you'd need passing, esp. on your trainees which is expensive.
If you have the money, you could buy a young excellent or formidable PM player with at least inad defense and let him play and train as an offensive defender that pushes your midfield.

21-06-2006, 19:52	#562
Tubby Rower Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Middle of VA. Posts: 3,896	I've heard that some people devote a full 3% to the VIP boxes __________________ 3/2006 : Now, surely that must be because some fists might have caused internal damage to certain delicate parts?

21-06-2006, 20:27	#563
arne1 King Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Netherlands. Posts: 1,455	As far as I know Dell gives the normal distribution. __________________ expect the worst than everything is a bonus

24-06-2006, 03:37	#568
BCLG100 Deity Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Lahndan Posts: 6,220	is that having either formation at say solid level? __________________ the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!!

24-06-2006, 10:23	#570
socralynnek Moderator Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: USS Defiant Posts: 3,827	Even at solid, there can be some small confusion, but I agree it's so seldom that from passable on, it is worth the risk. tofra, I'd more go for 5-3-2 as you have two nice strikers. 5-4-1 would be a waste then. Either play CA with one or two wingers or (as you don't have any real strong wingers) you could play with 3 IM or 2IM +1WTM and play AIM. But for both you'd need passing, esp. on your trainees which is expensive. If you have the money, you could buy a young excellent or formidable PM player with at least inad defense and let him play and train as an offensive defender that pushes your midfield. __________________ Being without a signature since November 2004.

21-06-2006, 19:37	#561
Dell19 King Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Grantham. Posts: 1,359	62.5%, 25%, 10%, 2.5% Or something like that.

22-06-2006, 04:21	#564
Dell19 King Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Grantham. Posts: 1,359	Some people vary it by 0.5 in VIPs and the second one however that doesn't make a massive difference.

23-06-2006, 21:39	#565
tofra Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Best, NL. Posts: 240	What's better: 5-4-1 or 5-3-2? Ít for next season, when i'm going to train defenders. At that point I have the availability of 2 Formidable scorers, and 1x Excelent Mid, 1x Solid Mid, 1x Passable Mid, 1x Passable Winger. Basicly, should I give up attacking for Midfielders (meaning more posession?)

23-06-2006, 22:31	#566
Darth Pugwash Warlord Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: . Posts: 269	I think you would lose out on quite a bit of posession playing a three-man midfield with those players, unless you are in a very weak division, so I would go for 5-4-1 seeing as your strikers sound good. (better than mine anyways!)