01-11-2005, 21:07 | #41 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Netherlands!.
Posts: 2,636
|
Well, according to Firaxis my videocard is too slow while I have an 128MB geforce4. Dunno wants wrong, apparently it reads the card wrongly. I am below the minimum settings (thats not thue).
The intro video is choppy (what's new) but the tutorial is handled ok. A custom game is slow on loading and playing. The game goes wild on my hard drive and chews away all memory. Processor isn't maxed out but the rest is. Defragging now (according to the bug reports that helps). |
01-11-2005, 21:19 | #42 |
c00l b33r
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beat 'm up Scotty!. Lives in the Lands that are Nether.
Posts: 5,094
|
Tried to run the game with this System Mechanic running. Guess what: when it started to optimize RAM crash to desktop. Just prior to that the graphics became unusually slow.
Going to inquire for both the 6600 and the 6600 GT this week, although the latter mainly seems to be available as PCI Express which my machine does not support.
__________________
That was a pretty good gamble. -- Scotty, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2821.5, Episode 14
|
01-11-2005, 21:48 | #43 |
King
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Sandwich Islands.
Posts: 1,529
|
I have a Winfast 6600GT (PCIe) but no Civ4.
__________________
I can't be arsed. |
01-11-2005, 23:54 | #44 | |
c00l b33r
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beat 'm up Scotty!. Lives in the Lands that are Nether.
Posts: 5,094
|
Quote:
__________________
That was a pretty good gamble. -- Scotty, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2821.5, Episode 14
|
|
03-11-2005, 13:22 | #45 |
King
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: idunno.
Posts: 2,428
|
Thaks for your help! Increasing the page size seems to have done the trick. I played a small game to the renisance era last night with no problems.
__________________
Stumbling from pillar to post... |
03-11-2005, 14:21 | #46 |
Customized Admin :)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sailing the seas of cheese.
Posts: 5,852
|
it runs quitr ok on my laptop even. Me surprised, especially as the graphics card uses my ordinary 512RAM. so effectively I'm running 384MB Ram.
Time to buy the extra 512MB
__________________
I fed my Dog the American Dream Well, he rolled over and he started to scream He said, I dig the taste of salt but it don't keep me alive yeah, yeah |
03-11-2005, 15:11 | #47 |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
firaxis sucks, hu?
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
03-11-2005, 16:42 | #48 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tampere, Finland
Posts: 4,828
|
I hope that's an ironic remark, but it has become a bit too much a stopgap IMO. They just made a game which everybody loves and gets high ratings at all review sites.
__________________
|
03-11-2005, 16:48 | #49 |
Emperor
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: HAWK!.
Posts: 4,365
|
matrix, they consistently manage to make nice games, but also consistently manage to fail making playable .0 or .1 versions of anything, except for a select few who happen to have the same PCs, and that only sometimes.
Imagine the games were cars - I do not think you'd have anything but disdain for am car manufacturer who's cars have a 90% breakdown rate at first start
__________________
One more turn..... just one more turn... one MORE! |
03-11-2005, 17:44 | #50 |
Emperor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,946
|
Though I garee this is annoying, 2 explanations (not "excuses") :
- The Car era started more than a century ago, whereas the Video Games era started something like 30 years ago. Man knows cars best. - Cars that don't run properly have a far greater chance to have you injured or killed, which isn't the case with video games. That translates into people buying defected video games more, because the risk is largely lower. Plus you can get patches for free, is it the case for cars ?
__________________
Sent from my Debian |