|
Home |
View Poll Results: So, Civ V is on it's way... excited? | |||
Yes! | 12 | 57.14% | |
No! | 2 | 9.52% | |
I like cookies | 7 | 33.33% | |
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
19-02-2010, 16:20 | #1 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
|
Civilization 5 is coming
Are you looking forward to it?
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |
19-02-2010, 16:29 | #2 |
Emperor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blame Canada!.
Posts: 3,501
|
I said no. I just don't have time to play that much anymore.
__________________
Postcount = Postcount + 1; //Postcount++ |
19-02-2010, 16:34 | #3 |
c00l b33r
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beat 'm up Scotty!. Lives in the Lands that are Nether.
Posts: 5,094
|
Yes, even more since I'm not playing Civ IV a lot anymore.
__________________
That was a pretty good gamble. -- Scotty, The Galileo Seven, stardate 2821.5, Episode 14
|
19-02-2010, 18:49 | #4 |
Nebuchadnezzar II
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Glover Park
Posts: 4,459
|
Civ4 is still quite an ugly game despite all the mods and expansions and patches. It has some strengths but gameplay is not smooth and not very enjoyable. Hopefully, Civ5 might improve on that.
__________________
Cujusvis hominis est errare; nullius, nisi insipientis in errore perseverare Ciceron (Marcus Tullius) |
19-02-2010, 21:29 | #5 |
Deity
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lahndan
Posts: 6,220
|
I'd certainly like to see how it turns out. People thought that civ 4 wouldnt catch on in the manner civ3 did when it first came out but times have changed... (at least that bloody revolutions rubbish never did!)
__________________
the sooner you fall behind, the more time you\'ll have to catch up! CDZ Cup Champion!!! |
20-02-2010, 12:25 | #6 |
Emperor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,946
|
I like cookies :
- No more Windows here. Haven't played Civ since mid-2007. - Still my all-time favourite video game, for various reasons, so I wanna know what they do with the legacy. Could be an idea to quickly sum up strengths and weaknesses of Civ4, especially compared to the previous versions of the series. As a final judgement before we move on to Civ5.
__________________
Sent from my Debian |
01-03-2010, 17:02 | #7 |
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,494
|
Pro: it's here, civ5 is not. I like civ4 a lot, but I don't have the time or patience to spend time on it. I think I should get a laptop to play it on the couch/in the garden/on holiday or something, maybe that will work. Civ4 has a lot working for it, but there was something about civ3 that was appealing. I think it's the lack of micromanagement in civ4, dunno. I think I forgot...
What's still bugging me about civ4 is the crappy resource placement. Was that any better in civ3? I forgot...
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!" |