View Single Post
Old 03-10-2016, 18:31   #38
socralynnek
Moderator
 
socralynnek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USS Defiant
Posts: 3,827
Default

For me Civ5 was hard to judge; I didn't had nearly as much time to invest in it as in Civ 1, 2, 3 or 4.

So, I haven't seen much of the depth or the flaws. It is possible that I have yet to finish the first game (a symptom I had with Civ2 as well that I started many games where the buildup was fun, but didn't continue until the end).
But probably this is due that if I have some hours as time window, it might be that the other game is months old and thus I'd rather start new.

Somehow all versions have their pros and cons and are worth playing because they are different enough from the version before, in my opinion.
Which one is the best is another question, but I'd rank III and IV above V (but V above I and II although both were great for their time)
__________________
Being without a signature since November 2004.
socralynnek is offline   Reply With Quote