Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie
After a couple of matches I am not impressed by the changes. In most cases 3-5-2 remains my favourite formation. The difference in midfield between 3-4-3/4-4-2/5-4-1 and 3-5-2 are too big to ignore. You simply still need to win midfield to make a mark.
With a comparable team as 3 seasons ago my ratings are very similar. True, midfield is slightly less, but not very dramatic.
What are the findings of my fellow CDZ-HT players?
|
I share your view. Midfield is worse, but so is that of the opponent. The net result is none. The only viable alternative are 4-5-1 or 4-4-2 with either OCD/DF, but that's terrible for your attack ratings. Or terribly expensive, because defensive forwards don't come cheap. I'm also not convinced that an OCD has a higher contribution to the midfield than the third IM.