View Single Post
Old 28-09-2016, 22:06   #34
Shabbaman
Administrator
 
Shabbaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Costa La Haya
Posts: 8,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by akots View Post
Not really. Criteria do not change. The game has to look good, work well, and be interesting with addictive gameplay.
Yet what actually "interesting" is changes over time. A reboot of civ2 in a civ6 engine wouldn't be as interesting as civ2 once was, because civ2 existed before. Nobody would play Pong nowadays. But in a different era, people have.

So I wonder if civ used to be interesting because it was "fresh", and current civs suck because, well, I've seen it before?
__________________
"Our spam is backed with COMETS!"
Shabbaman is offline   Reply With Quote