2 on 2 bloodbath anyone?
 

I'd like to start a 2 on 2 game (without AI).

Proposed settings (up to debate):
- small map
- emperor (for research speed)
- pangea or crossable continents
- maybe even no aggr. civs? [eek]

Three takers?

yeps

Count me in!

3

Fine! Next step: How do we build the teams? Any preference, or the order of signup?

grs, bedhead vs. Stapel, killer?
Everyone ok with no aggr. civs?
Do we use locked alliance and locked war or not?

teams sound good, I'd prefer no locked wars.

Since nobody objects to anything, I would say we play

- small map
- emperor
- pangea
- no aggr. civs
- grs, bedhead vs. Stapel, killer
- no locked wars/alliances

Can we agree about out-of-game map trading between teammates from the start?

Pick your civs and I can request a map.

Good good good. I will take Rome if no one minds.

I will take Persia then.

Killer, Stapel: pick your civs please!

AFAIK killer is on holiday for one more week, so this one is stalled. He said he may have forum access though, so again...

Killer, Stapel: pick your civs please!

No hurry, as long as this doesn't turn into the five player game. I still don't really know what happened there.

back - will try to talk to Bas on Monday and find us civs :)

I too would like to join this game ;)

hm, as we haven't heard from Bas in a long time here, how about Emperor_V takes his place?

that sounds like a good plan to me ;)