Shabbaman
22-01-2004, 15:47
Food for thought:
I was just looking at our beautiful civilization ladder, and then it struck me: shouldn't there be a distinction between the original civs and the civs that got revised in conquests? I mean, a lot of civs got other traits, should we take that in consideration?
Obviously, we could do that, but does it really add something?
Note that I'm not talking about added civs, only the revised civs.
I was just looking at our beautiful civilization ladder, and then it struck me: shouldn't there be a distinction between the original civs and the civs that got revised in conquests? I mean, a lot of civs got other traits, should we take that in consideration?
Obviously, we could do that, but does it really add something?
Note that I'm not talking about added civs, only the revised civs.